Legal Opinion

Cagney v. Cuson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. 8332PublishedCited by 22 opinions

From the Starke Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.

Action by Michael Cuson against Patrick Cagney. The complaint represented that, on the 11th day of March, 1879, and long prior thereto, the plaintiff was, and had been, a resident of the city of Chicago, in the State ■of Illinois, and was by vocation a boat-builder, without any knowledge of farming, or of farming implements, or other property used, or grown upon, a farm; that about ten days prior to that time the plaintiff was approached by one Watkins, of said city of Chicago, who represented himself to be an agent and attorney of the defendant, and who then and there proposed to exchange'…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Frenzel v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Kennedy v. RichardsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Wisconics Engineering, Inc. v. FisherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Johnson v. WysockiIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Manley v. FeltyIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  4. New v. JacksonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Grindrod v. Anglo-American Bond Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1906

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API