Legal Opinion

Merz v. Leitch

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 13, 1984No. CX-82-1175PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLEY, Justice.

Appellants, residents and taxpayers of Otter Tail County, appeal from a district court order dismissing their claims that three members of the Otter Tail County Board of Commissioners violated the Minnesota Open Meeting Law, Minn.Stat. § 471.705 (1982), by conducting county business at a meeting of the board prior to the time announced for the commencement of the meeting. We hold that there was a technical violation of the Open Meeting Law by the respondents. We further hold, *143prospectively, that conducting public business at a meeting prior to the time publicly announced for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Board of Public Instruction of Broward Cty. v. DoranSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
  2. Laman v. McCordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  3. State Ex Rel. Murray v. PalmgrenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  4. State v. MosengSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  5. Sullivan v. Credit River TownshipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Thuma v. KroschelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  2. Willison v. Pine Point Experimental SchoolCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  3. Claude v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  4. Merz v. LeitchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency v. BoyneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API