Legal Opinion
Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency v. Boyne
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 28, 1998No. C5-96-2325Published
1Opinion of the Court
578 N.W.2d 362 (1998)
SOUTHERN MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY, petitioner, Appellant,
v.
Bill BOYNE, et al., Respondents.
No. C5-96-2325.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
May 28, 1998.
Raymond A. Hayward, Julie Anne Rich, Dorsey & Whitney L.L.P., Rochester, for appellant.
Mark R. Anfinson, Minneapolis, for respondents.
Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.
OPINION
GILBERT, Justice.
This case raises the issue of whether appellant Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency (SMMPA), a municipal power agency incorporated pursuant to Minn.Stat. §§ 453.51-.62 (1996), is subject to the Minnesota Open…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Art Goebel, Inc. v. North Suburban Agencies, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Olson v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Doe v. Minnesota State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Sullivan v. Credit River TownshipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- St. Cloud Newspapers, Inc. v. District 742 Community SchoolsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.