Legal Opinion

Ewen v. Peoria & E. Ry. Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 8, 1940PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

L. HAND, Circuit Judge.

The facts are sufficiently stated in the report of the Interstate Commerce Commission, 239 I.C.C. 303, 320. (March 27, 1940), passing upon the plan, and we shall accept it as the background for our discussion. The objections are chiefly because the plan disregards rights originally secured to the intervenors in the reorganization of the Ohio, Indiana & Western Railroad, a mortgage upon which was foreclosed in 1889. On the sale under the decree in that suit, Coster and Spencer, who were acting for a committee of the old bondholders, bought in the property and effected a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Case v. Los Angeles Lumber Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. W. Trans. Co. of Buffalo v. . LansingNew York Court of Appeals · 1872

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ewen v. Peoria & E. Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  2. In Re Baltimore & O. R. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1945
  3. In re Peoria & Eastern Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941
  4. Ewen v. Peoria & E. Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  5. Gilbert v. Peoria & Eastern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API