Legal Opinion

In re Peoria & Eastern Ry. Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 3, 1941PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

Our judgment on the matters now presented1 is—

1. That Section 2 of the proposed agreement in respect of the Railroad Adjustment here involved to be made between the Peoria & Eastern Railway Company, the Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company — commonly known as the “Big Four” — the New York Central Railroad Company and the Central Hanover Bank and Trust Company, be and it hereby is amended so as to read as hereinafter prescribed.

2. That Section 24 of the final decree entered herein on the 29th day of July, 1940, be and it hereby is amended so as to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ewen v. Peoria & E. Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940
  2. In re Baltimore & O. R.District Court, D. Maryland · 1940
  3. In re Lehigh Valley R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ewen v. Peoria & E. Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  2. In Re Baltimore & O. R. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1945
  3. In re Peoria & E. Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1943
  4. Ewen v. Peoria & E. Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API