Legal Opinion

International Contract Co. v. City of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1914No. 11474PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Chapman, J.,' entered July 24, 1913, upon findings in favor of the defendant, in an action on contract, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The International Contract Company commenced this action in the superior court for Pierce county, against the city of Tacoma, to recover the sum of $33,885.52, claimed by it as a'balance due from the city upon the construction of the head works, tunnels, and river crossing near there, of the city’s Green river gravity water system. The city denied the factss pleaded by the contract company upon which its claim was rested, and made a counterclaim for which affirmative judgment was demanded, claiming certain errors and mistakes in estimates upon which payments to the contract company were made…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dyer v. Middle Kittitas Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. McHugh v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Savannah, A. & N. Ry. Co. v. OliverCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wright v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API