Legal Opinion

Roddy v. Stansbury

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 21, 1932No. 21965PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. It is a general rule that a verdict in favor of the defendant will not be set aside on account of an error in the charge of the court which relates only to the amount of the recovery, since, in view of the finding of the jury in favor of the defendant, such an error must generally be regarded as harmless. Barman v. Seaboard Air-Line Ry. Co., 33 Ga. App. 315, 324 (125 S. E. 891) ; Southwest Georgia Development Co. v. Griffin, 38 Ga. App. 276 (143 S. E. 784) ; Carstarphen v. Central of Ga. Ry. Co., 8 Ga. App. 162 (68 S. E. 848).

2. In the instant suit by the purchaser of an automobile, for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sarman v. Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Carstarphen v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  3. Southwest Georgia Development Co. v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lanners v. WhitneyOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Ludwig v. J. J. Newberry CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  3. Kesinger v. BurtrumMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. Willis v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API