Legal Opinion

State v. Phillips

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 23, 1969No. 6916SC359PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

The defendant took some sixteen exceptions during the course of the trial and assigned each one in his assignments of error. Many of these exceptions, however, were expressly abandoned in the brief.

The first exception is to the sustaining of an objection by the State to a question asked the witness Betty Butler on cross-examination. The record does not show what the answer to the question would have been, and therefore, we cannot tell whether the defendant was prejudiced.

This exception is without merit.

The second exception assigned by the defendant as error was to the effect that the court,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. TysonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. State v. LovedahlCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. EatmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. McPhersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  4. State v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API