State v. McPherson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtGraham, J.
Defendants assign as error the overruling by the court of their objection to an in-court identification of the defendants by the prosecuting witness Fisher.
When Fisher was asked to make an in-court identification of the three defendants, objections were interposed on the grounds that such identification would be tainted by the out-of-court identifications made of McPherson and Jones from photographs and made of Harris from the confrontation at the police station. Defendants contended the photographic technique used in this case was too suggestive in that the prosecuting witness was tendered…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- State v. PrimesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. PoolosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Reynolds Am. Inc. v. Third Motion Equities Master Fund Ltd.North Carolina Business Court · 2019