Legal Opinion

Baird v. Sickler

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1982No. 81-471PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Per curiam

This cause presents a novel question in Ohio: is a chief surgeon ever legally accountable for the negligence of an assisting nurse-anesthetist, not directly employed by him? If an operating physician may never be held liable in such a factual context, then the trial court in the instant case acted properly in directing a verdict in favor of the appellant, Dr. Sickler. We find, however, that a chief surgeon’s immunity for the negligent acts of an assisting nurse-anesthetist is not a matter of law and, thus, that the trial court erred in directing the verdict.

Civ. R. 50(A)(4) asserts the test…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Duke v. Sanymetal Products Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Halkias v. Wilkoff Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Bobik v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Robert B. Mider v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Hanson v. KynastOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Meena v. WilburnMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Lewis v. Physicians Insurance Co. of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Sanders v. Mt. Sinai HospitalOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Franklin v. GuptaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API