Legal Opinion

United States v. Paul Holmberg and Mariana C. Holmberg

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 7, 1994No. 93-3468PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUHÉ, Circuit Judge:

The United States appeals the denial of its motion to dismiss a suit brought by Paul and Mariana Holmberg under the Suits in Admiralty Act (SAA), 46 U.S.C.App. §§ 741-752. The Government argues that it was not served “forthwith” as required by 46 U.S.C. § 742 of the SAA. We agree and reverse the district court’s decision.

BACKGROUND

Paul Holmberg was injured while working as a seaman aboard a vessel owned by the United States through the Maritime Administration and managed by its general agent, OMI Ship Management, Inc. After Paul Holmberg’s administrative claim was denied,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. James Battaglia, Libelant-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  5. Vitoratos v. WalshSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. George v. CamachoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. Stewart v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1995
  4. Henderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  5. (PC) Gardner v. NewsomDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API