Legal Opinion

(PC) Gardner v. Newsom

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 2, 2020No. 1:20-cv-00240Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RONDEL DELBERT GARDNER, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00240-SAB (PC) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) SCREENING ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO 13 v. ) FILE A THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT AND REFERRING MATTER TO SUJEAN PARK, ADR 14 GAVIN NEWSOM, et.al., ) & PRO BONO COORDINATOR, TO LOCATE ) COUNSEL TO BE APPOINTED FOR THE 15 Defendants. ) LIMITED PURPOSE OF FILING A THIRD ) AMENDED COMPLAINT 16 ) ) [ECF No. 21] 17 ) 18 Plaintiff Rondel Delbert Gardner is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 19 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Wilhelm v. RotmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. YeskeySupreme Court of the United States · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API