Legal Opinion

Rogers v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 8, 1988No. 85-1421PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELSON, Associate Judge:

This appeal presents the questions, first, whether a reputation witness may testify to “negative evidence” of a defendant’s reputation, and second, whether the government may impeach a reputation witness by reference to the defendant’s juvenile arrests. We hold that negative evidence of reputation is admissible but that, in this case, the trial court’s exclusion of such testimony was harmless error. We also hold that the trial court properly allowed the government to test a witness’ knowledge of appellant’s reputation by asking whether the witness had heard that…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Baldwin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rogers v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Hummer v. LevinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Askew v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Hummer v. LevinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Rogers v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API