Legal Opinion
Hummer v. Levin
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 21, 1996No. 93-CV-721PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WAGNER, Chief Judge:
This case arises out of a claim of dental malpractice filed by appellant, Judith Ann Hummer, against appellees, Drs. Levin, Cohen, Goodman & Siegel, P.A., a professional corporation, for damages resulting from injuries sustained during a procedure performed by Dr. Martin D. Levin in the course of his employment with the corporation. The case was tried twice by a jury. The first trial resulted in a jury verdict for Hummer in the amount of $4,000,000. However, the trial court granted appellees’ motion for new trial on the ground that its ruling excluding certain evidence…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Dan Lind v. Schenley Industries IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- O'NEIL v. BerganDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Oxendine v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Rich v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Scott v. JamesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Hawthorne v. CanavanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Murray v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Hummer v. LevinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Scott v. JamesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.