Rogers v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
ROGERS, Chief Judge,
with whom NEWMAN and FERREN, Associate Judges, and MACK, Associate Judge, Retired, join, concurring in part and dissenting in part:
I join the majority opinion adopting Federal Rule 405(a) permitting lay character witnesses to testify as to their opinion of a defendant as well as their knowledge of the defendant’s reputation. [Majority opinion at 74.]
I am unable to join the majority opinion holding that a reputation character witness may be cross examined by the government concerning the witness’ knowledge of a defendant’s juvenile arrests. To have a consistent body of law…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Thomas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- McAdoo v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Devore v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Rogers v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988