Stroud v. Ozark Nat'l Life Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 124,348 CATHY L. STROUD, Appellant, v. OZARK NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. and STEPHEN I. GUINN, Appellees. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. K.S.A. 2024 Supp. 60-217 requires that an action shall be prosecuted in the name of the party who, by the substantive law, has the right sought to be enforced. A substantive right to recover in a particular action is neither enlarged nor restricted by the real party in interest statute. 2. To establish a breach of fiduciary duty, a plaintiff must prove: (1) the existence of a duty arising from a fiduciary…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Stechschulte v. JenningsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- Glenn v. FlemingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
- Denison State Bank v. MadeiraSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
- Leiker Ex Rel. Leiker v. GaffordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
- Pizel v. ZuspannSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Antimo, LLC v. ReichDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025
- Craig Browning v. United National Insurance Company and Jace KirkDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025
- David Crawford v. The Guaranty State Bank & Trust Company, et al.District Court, D. Kansas · 2026
- Oakes Auto, Inc., et al. v. Mitsubishi Motors of North AmericaDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2026
- State v. ManczukSupreme Court of Kansas · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.