Legal Opinion
Llewellyn v. Queen City Dairy, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided July 23, 1946No. [No. 164, October Term, 1945.]PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGrason, J.
On February 23,1946, the Queen City Dairy, Inc., filed its amended bill of complaint against Clarence U. Llewellyn and Harvey E. England, in the Circuit Court for Allegany County, in Equity, to which the defendants interposed a combined demurrer and answer. Thereafter James E. Miltenberger and J. William Loar, respectively, .petitioned the court to be made parties plaintiff in the case, and the court passed orders permitting them to be made parties plaintiff, and each of them adopted, in its entirety, the allegations of the amended bill of complaint. There was objection to the court’s action…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Boulden v. StilwellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
- Goodwin v. AgassizMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Mayor of Baltimore v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1904
- Blabon v. HayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Seitz v. FreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Daily Income Fund, Inc. v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- The Sommers Drug Stores Company Employee Profit Sharing Trust, Cross-Appellee v. Walter N. Corrigan and Corrigan Enterprises, Inc., Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Shenker v. Laureate Education, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Waller v. WallerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
- Barnes v. Eastern & Western Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1955
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.