Holmes v. Holt
Supreme Court of Kansas
OPINION ON PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION. Appeal from Shawnee district court, division No. 1; Alston W. Dana, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
West, J.:
This case has been twice decided. (Holmes v. Holt, 90 Kan. 774, 136 Pac. 246; 92 Kan. 254, 139 Pac. 1030.) It is insisted, however, by counsel for the plaintiff that divers misstatements -and omissions justify a reconsideration, and it has been thought proper to make a reexamination of the case and that the result be formulated.
THE ISSUES.
From the abstracts it appears that the petition alléged that the plaintiff, about June 27, 1903, contracted with Goodell and wife for the purchase of a 40-acre tract of land and went into possession under the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Wooden-Ware Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- United States v. Homestake Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- Voiers v. Atkins Bros.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
- Sunnyside Coal & Coke Co. v. ReitzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
- Holden Land & Live Stock Co. v. Inter-State Trading Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1912
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mater v. BoeseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Sims v. Eberhardt Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- Wolf v. WeissbeckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943