Legal Opinion

Wolf v. Weissbeck

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 10, 1943No. 35,876PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, C. J.:

This is an appeal from a judgment sustaining a demurrer to plaintiff’s evidence in an action for damages for the alleged conversion of wheat and barley which were the crops harvested from- a half section of Gove county land in 1942.

Plaintiff’s petition alleged that he was the owner of the property and that defendants had converted it to their own use.

One defendant, Martin Weissbeck, answered with a general denial, disclaimed any interest in the subject matter, and prayed to be protected against costs.

The other defendant, Pius Weissbeck,-…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burnham v. BurnhamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  2. Rathbone v. BoydSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  3. Brendle v. HudsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. Duncan v. YordySupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  5. Holmes v. HoltSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mater v. BoeseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API