United States v. United States Ex Rel. Thornton
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:
This appeal presents the issue of how to value a False Claims Act settlement when the settlement includes both cash and released claims against the government. The government appeals the district court’s determination that the award of the qui tam relator, Peter Thornton, should be calculated using both the cash value of the settlement and the court’s estimate of the value of the defendants’ released contractual claims against the government. We conclude that ordinarily the value of such released claims shall be added to any cash paid to the government…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Robin Free and Renee Free v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Inc., and Mead Johnson & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- United States Ex Rel., Christopher Hall v. Teledyne Wah Chang Albany Teledyne Industries, Inc., Dba Teledyne Wah Chang Albany and Teledyne, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States Ex Rel. Burr v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1995
- United States v. General ElectricDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States of America, Ex Rel. Leocadio Barajas v. United States v. Northrop CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States Ex Rel. Alderson v. Quorum Health Group, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2001
- UNITED STATES ex rel. [REDACTED] v. [REDACTED]District Court, D. Utah · 2001
- United States Ex Rel. Longhi v. Lithium Power Technologies, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
- United States Ex Rel. Shutt V.Community Home & Health Care Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.