Legal Opinion

Ge Lee v. George Tong Lee

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 29, 2009No. F056107PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LEVY, Acting P. J.

Appellants, George Tong Lee (George) and Kathy Maiker Lee (Kathy), challenge the trial court’s finding that their interest in property owned by various members of the Lee family was validly transferred to respondent, Fue Sue Lee (Fue Sue). Appellants acknowledge that, following their request that the property be sold, they received $50,000 from George’s mother and brother pursuant to an oral agreement. Appellants assert this payment was a no-interest loan. In contrast, George’s mother and brother contend they bought George and Kathy’s interest. Four years after…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Walsh v. HuntCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Vallbona v. SpringerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Sterling v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Montgomery v. Bank of America National Trust and Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Kirkpatrick v. Tapo Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rutledge v. Hewlett-Packard Co.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Lin v. CoronadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Santa Clara County Office of Public Guardian v. G.H.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Aghaian v. MinassianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. Lin v. CoronadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API