Legal Opinion

Tepperwien v. Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 27, 2009No. 7:07-mj-00433PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

SEIBEL, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff commenced this action against his former employer, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (“Entergy”), on January 19, 2007, alleging that repeated incidents of same-sex sexual harassment at the workplace, and Entergy’s failure to take appropriate steps in response thereto, constitute a violation of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000b. 1 On March 31, 2008, Defendant moved for summary judgment, arguing that Plaintiff is unable, as a matter of law, to establish a prima facie case of hostile work environment, retaliation, or…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tepperwien v. Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  2. Copantitla v. Fiskardo Estiatorio, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  3. Anderson v. Amazon.com, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2024
  4. Burke v. LouisDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021
  5. Cabrera-Cardona v. LaborDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API