Legal Opinion

Tepperwien v. Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 31, 2011No. Docket 10-1425-cvPublishedCited by 222 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge GLEESON dissents by separate opinion.

CHIN, Circuit Judge:

In this case, plaintiff-appellant James Tepperwien was employed as a security officer by defendant-appellee Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (“Entergy”) at the Indian Point Energy Center (“Indian Point”) in Buchanan, New York. Tepperwien contends that he was sexually harassed by a co-worker, and brought this action below asserting claims for constructive discharge, hostile environment sexual harassment, and retaliation, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”).

On Entergy’s motion for…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Hicks v. BainesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by222 opinions

  1. Rivera v. Rochester Genesee Regional Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  2. Garcia v. Hartford Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  3. Davis v. New York City Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  4. In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  5. Bowen-Hooks v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014

217 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API