Legal Opinion · Dissent

Multnomah County v. Talbot

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 8, 1982No. A7905-02468, CA 19960Published

1DissentWarren, J.

I dissent because it appears clear to me that the circuit court had no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal from the state historic preservation officer’s decision to approve the classification of the subject property as historic property.

ORS 358.495 on its face does not authorize such an appeal. It provides:

“(1) The state historic preservation officer shall immediately notify the county assessor and the applicant of his approval or disapproval of the application * * *.

i£* * * * *

“(3) Any owner whose application for classification has been denied by the state historic preservation officer…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lane County v. R. A. Heintz Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Fullerton v. LammOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Barrett v. Union Bridge Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API