Tynan v. Warren
New Jersey Court of Chancery
•On bill, answer, replication and proofs.
1Opinion of the Court
Green, V. C.
This bill is to establish a trust.
The complainant Tynan and defendant Warren were sureties on ,an administrator’s bond, dated February 8th, 1876, in the penalty of $16,000, filed in the Passaic county surrogate’s office.
*314On a rumor that the administrators were mismanaging the-estate, one o-f them, on May 6th, 1876, assigned to Tynan and Warren as indemnity in respect of their liability, all his interest: in a mortgage of $7,000, on property in Paterson, which - mortgage, at the time of such assignment, was held by the PassaicCounty Savings Bank as collateral for a note for $5,000,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Oliver v. PiattSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- Flagg v. MannU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1837
- Smith v. BurnhamU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1838
- American Surety Co. v. ConwaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1917
- Whiting v. GouldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1853
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Crandol v. GarrisonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
- Bruen v. TeppermanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
- Staub v. Lafayette Piece Dye Works, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946