People v. Jackson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The suppression court properly determined that exigent circumstances justified the warrantless entry of the apartment occupied by defendant and the codefendant (see, People v Burr, 124 AD2d 5, affd 70 NY2d 354, cert denied 485 US 989; People v Williams, 181 AD2d 474, lv denied 79 NY2d 1055). Prior to that entry, the police had probable cause to believe that defendant and the codefendant had assaulted two victims with a wooden board, and possibly a hammer, in separate incidents committed only hours before. *957The police also had strong reason to believe…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. SatloffNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. MottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- People v. StahlNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. BurrNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. ReedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. TopolskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. WoodenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Jackson v. LacyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.