Legal Opinion

Serota v. Serota

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKadien, J.

This is an action to compel the specific performance of a subscription agreement to which the plaintiffs and the defendants were parties. It was therein agreed to purchase and acquire certain capital stock in the Park City Pure Ice Co., Incorporated, a Connecticut corporation, and to limit and restrict the alienation of such stock in the manner therein provided.

*28The corporation involved has a total of some three hundred and fifty shares of stock outstanding. The plaintiff Leon A. Serota, owning thirty-two shares, and the plaintiff Hardtla, owning fifteen shares, seek to set aside the sale and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barrett v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  2. Knight v. KitchinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  3. Hassel v. PohleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tu-Vu Drive-In Corp. v. AshkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Mathews v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1964
  3. Kensinger v. McDavidCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. Birmingham Artificial Limb Company v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  5. Lawrence v. CohnDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API