Legal Opinion

Knight v. Kitchin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 17, 1933PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdgcomb, J.

A brief review of the facts leading up to the execution and delivery of the mortgage sought to be foreclosed in this action is necessary, because the defense centers about a certain agreement which was made by the plaintiffs and the defendant John Kitchin on April 11, 1931, prior to the execution of said mortgage and the accompanying bend.

In January, 1924, the plaintiffs in this action, George R. Van Alstyne and Archibald S. Knight, and the defendant John Kitchin became interested in a joint venture, the details of which are unimportant here, involving certain real property situated on the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Beatty v. . Guggenheim Exploration Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Pimpinello v. Swift & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Lawrence v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  4. Bloomquist v. . FarsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Harris v. . ShorallNew York Court of Appeals · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Angerosa v. White Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  2. Alside Aluminum Supply Co. v. BerlinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  3. White v. IdsardiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  4. Struhl v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  5. Serota v. SerotaNew York Supreme Court · 1938

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API