Legal Opinion

Hall v. Speer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 20, 2011No. 080506976; A145014PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.

Plaintiff was injured in an automobile accident caused by an underinsured motorist and ultimately prevailed in an action for underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits against her insurer, defendant Allstate. The only issue before us at this point in this case is whether she provided Allstate with “proof of loss” resulting from the accident more than six months before Allstate accepted coverage and consented to binding arbitration. If she did, then she is entitled to attorney fees. ORS 742.061 (set out below). The trial court ruled that she did not. We reverse and remand.

The relevant facts are…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stephens v. BohlmanOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. Illig-RennOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Heis v. Allstate Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Dockins v. State Farm InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Weatherspoon v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Zimmerman v. Allstate Property & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. Hall v. SpeerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API