Legal Opinion

Zimmerman v. Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 23, 2011No. 081217951; A146460PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In this appeal by defendant Allstate Insurance from a judgment awarding plaintiff attorney fees under ORS 742.061 on her action for underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits under the terms of her automobile insurance policy, the question is whether Allstate is entitled to take advantage of the “safe harbor” provided by ORS 742.061(3) because, not later than six months from the date of proof of loss, it accepted coverage and consented to submit plaintiffs claim to binding arbitration.

Allstate makes arguments identical to those that we considered and rejected in Hall v. Speer, 244 Or App 392, 261…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dockins v. State Farm InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Scott v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Hall v. SpeerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Zimmerman v. Allstate Property & Casualty InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Congdon v. BergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. Hall v. SpeerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API