Legal Opinion
Brant v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
Decided November 19, 1999No. A-6879, A-6978PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEWART, Judge.
The single issue presented in these two consolidated appeals is whether these two appellants were “convicted of a felony” for purposes of AS 11.61.200(a)(1) (felon in possession of a concealable firearm) when they possessed a concealable firearm after they had been found guilty of a felony but before sentence was imposed. We conclude that defendants who have entered a plea or have been found guilty of a felony at trial are “convicted of a felony” for purposes of this statute.
Facts and proceedings
On February 14, 1995, Charles L. Brant pled no contest to third-degree…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Davis v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. HolmesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
- People v. AllaireColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dayton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2005
- Hertz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2001
- Wooley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2007
- Brant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1999
- State v. AndreanoffCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.