Legal Opinion

Dayton v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided September 16, 2005No. A-8791PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

This case requires us to resolve the slight inconsistency between the "Austin" rule-the sentencing rule first established by this Court in Austin v. State, 627 P.2d 657, 657-58 (Alaska App.1981)-and the later legislative codification of that rule in former AS 12.55.125(k)(2).

As we explain in more detail below, we promulgated the Austin rule under our common-law authority to create rules to implement and supplement the then-existing statutes governing the sentencing of first felony offenders convicted of class B and class C felonies-i.e., offenders who were not subject…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Austin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1981
  3. Evans Ex Rel. Kutch v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Sprague v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Bauman v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lamb v. AndersonAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. DagueCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2006
  3. Marunich v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2006
  4. Smart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2006
  5. Dominguez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API