Dayton v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MANNHEIMER, Judge.
This case requires us to resolve the slight inconsistency between the "Austin" rule-the sentencing rule first established by this Court in Austin v. State, 627 P.2d 657, 657-58 (Alaska App.1981)-and the later legislative codification of that rule in former AS 12.55.125(k)(2).
As we explain in more detail below, we promulgated the Austin rule under our common-law authority to create rules to implement and supplement the then-existing statutes governing the sentencing of first felony offenders convicted of class B and class C felonies-i.e., offenders who were not subject…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Austin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1981
- Evans Ex Rel. Kutch v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Sprague v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Bauman v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lamb v. AndersonAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. DagueCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2006
- Marunich v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2006
- Smart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2006
- Dominguez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.