Legal Opinion

Granger v. Superior Court of Nev. Cty.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1910No. S.F. No. 5345PublishedCited by 8 opinions

'APPLICATION for Writ of Prohibition to restrain the further prosecution of two actions in the Superior Court of Nevada County. George L. Jones, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT (Beatty, C. J., not participating).

This is an application to this court for a writ of prohibition against further proceedings in the superior court of Nevada County in two certain actions in said court: 1. The action of Máry A. Benallaek against William G. Richards, James Benailack, and Francis L. Richards, as executors of the estate of Phillip Richards, deceased, and William S. Richards and William G. Richards, as individuals, begun February 11, 1895, and numbered 2343 in said court; 2. The action of Samuel Granger against the same parties, begun May 19, 1897, and numbered 2635 in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Granger v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Bennalack v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Baird v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. United Security Bank & Trust Co. v. Superior Court of Orange CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Spitzer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Boullester v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Reidy v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Supreme Court · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API