Legal Opinion

Bennalack v. Richards

California Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1897No. Sac. No. 162PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Nevada County and from an order denying a new trial. Joiij Caldwell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

Philip Richards died in 1887, leaving a last will and testament by which he made certain specific legacies, and left the residue of his estate to his brothers, William S. Richards and Francis Richards. He appointed William G. Richards, Francis Richards, and John Bennalack as executors of his will, and gave them power, after the expiration of two years from his death, to sell any portion of his estate at public or private sale, “ without any order of court or being required to account to any court.” Under this power the executors sold certain land at public auction May 11, 1891, and on the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re Estate of DelaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Larco v. CasaneuavaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  3. In re Estate DurhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  4. In re the Estate of WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Thornagel v. PforrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Granger v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. In Re the Estate of ShawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. In Re Estate of GrahamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. Granger v. Superior Court of Nev. Cty.California Supreme Court · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API