Legal Opinion
Trimmer v. United States Department of Labor
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 6, 1999No. 97-9544PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
Lenard E. Trimmer brought an administrative action under 42 U.S.C. § 5851, the whistleblower provision of the Energy Reorganization Act, against his employer, the Los Alamos National Laboratory (the “Lab”), which is owned by the Department of Energy but run by the University of California. Trimmer claimed that the Lab wrongfully delayed an alternate employment-placement process because he had engaged in statutorily protected activity. The Administrative Review Board (“ARB”) of the Department of Labor 1 dismissed his complaint. Trimmer appeals on the premise that the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Walton Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Sibley Memorial Hospital v. Verne WilsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- O'ROURKE v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Custer County Action Ass'n v. GarveyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Anderson v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Allen v. Administrative Review Bd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Forest Guardians v. United States Fish & Wildlife ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.