Legal Opinion
Forest Guardians v. United States Fish & Wildlife Service
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 7, 2010No. 08-2226PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMES, Circuit Judge.
Forest Guardians1 appeals the denial of its petition for review of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (“FWS”) decision to reintroduce a nonessential experimental population of endangered Northern Aplomado Falcons (“Falcons”) into southern New Mexico. Forest Guardians contends that the FWS violated section 10(j) of the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. § 1539®, when it allegedly promulgated a final rule to release captive-bred Falcons within the current range of the species and in an area that is not wholly separate geographically from an existing Falcon…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Don Olenhouse v. Commodity Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Save Our Sound OBX, Inc. v. NC Dept of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- Wyoming v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- New Mexico Department of Game & Fish v. United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Hillsdale Environmental Loss Prevention, Inc. v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- San Juan Citizens Alliance v. StilesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.