Legal Opinion
Sanner v. Government Employees Ins. Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 30, 1976PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
143 N.J. Super. 462 (1976)
363 A.2d 397
MICHAEL J. SANNER, PLAINTIFF,
v.
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided July 30, 1976.
Messrs Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer for plaintiff.
Messrs. Hansen, Pantages, Sellar & Zavesky for defendant.
LONGHI, J.C.C., Temporarily Assigned.
This matter comes before the court on a stipulated set of facts and, by consent of the parties, is being treated as a declaratory judgment action to determine plaintiff's rights under the Personal Injury Protection Benefits (PIP) of an automobile insurance policy issued in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Tom York, D/B/A York's Mobil Service, and John HareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Harlan v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Lefebvre v. Government Employees InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969
- United Services Automobile Ass'n v. HollandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
- KATZ v. GreigSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sanner v. Government Employees Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Miskofsky v. Ohio Cas. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- Lapidula v. Government Employees Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977