Legal Opinion

Griffith v. Sullivan

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided April 16, 1992No. Civ. A. No. 86-2556-YPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

YOUNG, District Judge.

On February 1, 1988, this Court denied the Secretary’s previous motions to dismiss this class action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and mootness. Griffith v. Bowen, 678 F.Supp. 942 (D.Mass.1988).1 Both parties have now filed cross-motions for partial summary judgment concerning the validity of the screening list, created by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“Secretary”) to determine Medicare Part B eligibility. The Health Care Financing Administration determines what medical equipment is covered by Medicare. The screening list is…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Heckler v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Bowen v. Michigan Academy of Family PhysiciansSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. William Edward Goodermote v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
  4. Schweiker v. McClureSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Raymond R. DA ROSA, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robert Griffith v. Louis M. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. Griffith v. Sullivan, M.D.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  3. Griffith v. Sullivan, M.D.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API