Legal Opinion
Neidhoefer v. Automobile Ins. Co. Of Hartford, Conn
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 12, 1950No. 10022PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAJOR, Chief Judge.
This action was to recover upon a certain policy of insurance issued by the defendant to the plaintiff for the alleged losses of certain furs and jewelry described in the complaint as the property of his former wife, Annette Neidhoefer. Recovery was sought by the plaintiff as the named assured in said policy and also under an assignment by Annette Neidhoefer of all her right, title and interest in and to the said policy and claims thereunder. The complaint admitted failure to file a detailed sworn proof of loss as required by the policy but alleged that this requirement had…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Arthur v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Spence v. Washington National InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943
- Feder v. Midland Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1925
- Central Manufacturers' Mutual Insurance v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
- Schurler v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Mazzilli v. Acc. & Cas. Ins. Co. of WinterthurSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,437 Hetty Fey v. Walston & Co., Inc., and Robert A. SpiraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Gibson v. CallaghanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1963
- Leteff v. Maryland Casualty CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.