Legal Opinion

Estate of Vanderhurst

California Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1915No. S. F. No. 7258PublishedCited by 18 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Mary A. Jacobs and Lillian M. Vanderhurst, daughters of William Vanderhurst, deceased, appeal from a decree of distribution in the estate of said deceased person.

The principal matter involved in this appeal is the action of the probate court in charging the two appellants with certain advancements. Miss Vanderhurst was thus debited with a sum in excess of nine thousand dollars and Mrs. Jacobs with something over two thousand dollars.

Respondents make a preliminary objection to the consideration of the appeal. They say that appellants may only receive the aid which they seek by a new trial;…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brown v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. In Re Estate of PlumelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. In Re Estate of FranklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. In Re the Estate of TompkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. In Re the Estate of HayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Kline v. Citizens National Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Estate of MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Estate of BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Allenbach v. RidenourNevada Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Estate of BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API