Legal Opinion
Boykin v. Bergesen D.Y. A/S
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided January 19, 1994No. Civ. A. 2:92cv391PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MORGAN, District Judge.
This matter was tried before the Court upon claims arising out of a maritime casualty aboard the merchant ship M/V BERGE CHARLOTTE. After various pretrial motions, the parties to this action at trial were as follows: Plaintiff Volpe M. Boykin (“Boy-kin”) as administrator of the estate of Denzil J. Pereira (“Pereira”) maintains a suit against Defendants U.S. Steel Mining Co., Inc. (“USS”) and China Steel Corporation (“China Steel”) 1 for damages related to Pereira’s death. Defendant and Cross-claim Plaintiff Bergesen D.Y. A/S (“Bergesen”), the owner of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Reliable Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Herman T. DOVE, Appellant, v. CODESCO, Formerly Known as Washington Dental Supply Company, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
- Cooper Stevedoring Co. v. Fritz Kopke, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Raymond Leger, Cross-Appellant v. Drilling Well Control, Inc., Dresser Offshore Services, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Self v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Boykin v. China Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Boykin v. China Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996