Legal Opinion

COMMONWEALTH OF KY. EX REL. HANCOCK v. Ruckelshaus

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided August 13, 1973No. Civ. A. 7480-GPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JAMES F. GORDON, Chief Judge.

This suit, brought on behalf of the Commonwealth of Kentucky by State Attorney General Ed W. Hancock, raises an important question concerning the authority of the States to regulate Federal activities and installations 1 under the Clean Air Act of 1970, 42 U.S.C.' Section 1857 et seq. In general, the plaintiff asserts that Federal entities operating equipment or installations which emit air contaminants must secure a permit from the Kentucky Pollution Control Commission before operating such equipment. The permit re quirement in question…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Dugan v. RankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hancock v. TrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. State of Florida Ex Rel. Robert L. Shevin, Attorney General, Plaintiff v. Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  3. John Vishnevsky and Margaret Vishnevsky v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
  4. Canadian Fur Trappers Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  5. Wisconsin's Environmental Decade, Inc. v. Wisconsin Power & Light Co.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1975

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API