Legal Opinion

Desrochers v. Atwood-Crawford Co.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided November 10, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarrows, J.

These are “Workmen’s Compensation” appeals by petitioner and respondent. Petitioner’s claim in the Superior Court was that an acute glaucoma was produced by getting a particle of sawdust in his right eye, already blind from chronic glaucdma and that the mishap accelerated the failing vision in his chronically glacomatous left eye, finally causing total blindness. He asked for compensation for the removal of the right eye, the time necessary for recovery from the operation, and permanent disability by reason of total blindness. The first two claims were allowed and the third was disallowed.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McClary v. HubbardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  2. Gorral v. William H. Hamlyn & SonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1915
  3. Wardwell's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1922
  4. Barber Ex Rel. Barber v. George R. Jones Shoe Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Edge v. City of PierreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Tice v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Henry v. American Enamel CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1927
  4. Caspar v. East Providence Artesian Well Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1927
  5. Di Benedetto v. CaponeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API