Legal Opinion

Henry v. American Enamel Company

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided January 28, 1927PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarrows, J.

This is an appeal from a decree of the Superior Court refusing relief under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Petitioner sought allowance of his bill for medical services rendered to an employee of respondent. The services were rendered at the instance of the employee, starting September 17, 1920. The bill of the doctor against the employer was presented January 31, 1924, and the petition now before us was filed March 22, 1926.

Petitioner’s claim against the respondent is created by and subject to the terms of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Article II, Sec. 5 (1216), G. L. 1923, Ch. 92, permits…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Paolis v. Tower Hill Connellsville Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  2. Petraska v. National Acme Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1921
  3. Desrochers v. Atwood-Crawford Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1925

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Orthopedic Specialists, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
  2. Merrimac Anthracite Coal Corp. v. ShowalterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932
  3. Tavernier v. McBurneySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1973
  4. State v. ColasantiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1966
  5. Redfearn v. PAWTUXET VALLEY DYEING COMPANYSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API