Legal Opinion

State v. Hurt

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 15, 2014No. COA09-442-2PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Judge.

This case is before this Court on remand from the Supreme Court of North Carolina. Our Supreme Court held that for the reasons stated in State v. Ortiz-Zape, _ N.C. _, 743 S.E.2d 156 (2013), Defendant’s rights under the Confrontation Clause were not violated. State v. Hurt, _ N.C. _, 743 S.E.2d 173 (2013). On remand, we address Defendant’s remaining arguments.

David Franklin Hurt (“Defendant”) appeals from a judgment imposing a sentence in the aggravated range for second-degree murder. Specifically, Defendant alleges the trial court erred by (1) denying his motion to dismiss the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. State v. CampbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  3. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  4. State v. ButlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  5. State v. BrewingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. StimsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  2. Hurt v. KuehnertDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API