Legal Opinion

United States v. William Nelson Davis

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 17, 2003No. 02-50451PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TROTT, Circuit Judge:

William Nelson Davis (“Davis”) appeals his conviction and sentence for escape, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 751(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Davis argues that the district court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the indictment for failure adequately to allege criminal intent. Because the indictment sufficiently tracked the language of § 751(a), and because the term “escape” as used in the indictment unambiguously set forth the proper criminal intent, we affirm.

BACKGROUND

Davis was convicted for bringing into the United States an illegal…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. Deborah Jean RossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Terrance Ray TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. Frank R. AlberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. Bryan K. KalunaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. KayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. Reyes-BonillaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. DossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. MilovanovicCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. FullerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API