Legal Opinion

State v. Porter

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 29, 1979No. 1521, CA 11383PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, J.

Defendant’s first motion to suppress was granted by the trial court and reversed by this court in State v. Porter, 31 Or App 229, 570 P2d 111 (1977) rev den (1978). He was then convicted of criminal activity in drugs and he appeals. He assigns as error the trial court’s denial of his renewed motion to suppress.

In the first appeal we held that the police officer’s contact with defendant and request for identification did not constitute a stop as defined in ORS 131.605(5), thus mooting the question whether the officer had reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. The facts are set out in that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. State v. SpenstCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. State v. CordrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. State v. WengerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. State v. ThackerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API