Commonwealth v. Williams
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
The Commonwealth contends that the lower court erred in suppressing a quantity of drugs seized from appellees. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the order of the lower court.
At approximately 12:30 a.m. on September 23, 1979, Officer Harry Fruecht was on patrol in Upper St. Clair when he saw two cars parked in the middle of a dark, abandoned, private parking lot of a swimming pool which was being salvaged. The two cars were parallel to each other and were facing the street. Appellees were seated in the front of one of the cars, a Plymouth. Another person was standing at the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LopezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. TrengeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. LapiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. KearneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. EspadaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.