Commonwealth v. Roach
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROBERTS, Justice.
In 1969, a jury convicted appellant of murder of the first degree for killing the manager of a bar while committing a robbery. The court denied post-verdict motions. This Court affirmed judgment of sentence. Commonwealth v. Roach, 444 Pa. 368, 282 A.2d 382 (1971). In 1975, appellant, represented by new counsel, filed a petition under the Post-Conviction Hearing Act, 1 alleging ineffectiveness of trial counsel. The PCHA court denied the petition. We affirm. 2
Appellant did not raise ineffectiveness of trial counsel on direct appeal. He has not waived that…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Commonwealth v. DancerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. FutchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. McCutchenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. TriplettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. GordonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. BonacursoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. GriffinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. ProctorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.