Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Roach

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 14, 1978No. 88PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROBERTS, Justice.

In 1969, a jury convicted appellant of murder of the first degree for killing the manager of a bar while committing a robbery. The court denied post-verdict motions. This Court affirmed judgment of sentence. Commonwealth v. Roach, 444 Pa. 368, 282 A.2d 382 (1971). In 1975, appellant, represented by new counsel, filed a petition under the Post-Conviction Hearing Act, 1 alleging ineffectiveness of trial counsel. The PCHA court denied the petition. We affirm. 2

Appellant did not raise ineffectiveness of trial counsel on direct appeal. He has not waived that…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. DancerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. FutchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Commonwealth v. McCutchenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. TriplettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. GordonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. BonacursoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. GriffinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Commonwealth v. ProctorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API