Commonwealth v. Triplett
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROBERTS, Justice.
In this appeal from a denial of relief under the Post Conviction Hearing Act, 1 appellant contends that 1) trial counsel was ineffective because he did not adequately advise appellant of his appellate rights before recommending a plea of guilty; and 2) the trial court erred in accepting appellant’s guilty plea without first conducting an adequate colloquy to explain the nature of the charges and the scope of the rights appellant was surrendering. Because the first contention lacks merit and the second contention has not been properly preserved for our…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Commonwealth v. ClairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. DancerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. FutchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by146 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Abu-JamalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. ChesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. ChristySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
141 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.